Congress Just Voted Against Your Internet Privacy Rights
Rachel Maddow Show, Wed., Apr. 5, 2017 (3 videos)

Senate Intel. Committee Investigation: Real Objectivity or Just the Appearance Thereof?

Screen Shot 2017-03-30 at 9.33.23 PMI don't know whether Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Richard Burr has a truly objective mindset re: the Russia investigation because my mind-reading machine broke down a few months ago.

Yes, Sen. Burr behaves and speaks like a dignified adult, unlike some of the simian Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee.

After House Intel. Committee Chair Devin Nunes's bizarre shenanigans, Sen. Burr certainly is a calming breath of fresh air.  I understand why pundits compliment Burr when comparing his demeanor to Nunes's.

But are good manners a solid indicator that Sen. Burr will approach the Trump-Russia investigation in a truly objective way?

I ask that question partly because of the following two things:

(1) In October, Sen. Burr became an adviser to Trump's campaign.

(2) In February, the White House asked Sen. Burr to talk to reporters--to counter stories relating to Trump's ties to Russia--and Burr did it.

Yes, it is possible that Sen. Burr takes the Russia-situation seriously enough to put aside any loyalty and protectiveness toward Pres. Trump.

But Sen. Burr's ability to act like a rational, intelligent adult is not conclusive evidence that he will lead the investigation objectively.

For that reason, I wish that pundits (e.g., Lawrence O'Donnell and Joe Scarborough) would stop marveling over how objective and nonpartisan Sen. Burr is. At this point, it's only surface stuff.



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.